Well colour me shocked! ACON is finally being exposed by legacy media.

After years of articles and research by Binary, the trans lobby group is getting the serve it deserves. 

The Australian has published two major articles highlighting the tax payer funded activism that has captured our public service and major Australian companies.

ACON may have begun as the NSW Aids Council but it has morphed into a trans activist powerhouse that awards companies who sign up to promote their narrative. 

“The entanglement with ACON is everywhere,” says the Lesbian Action Group’s Nicole Mowbray.

“It’s spreading through schools, it’s going through the public service, through all facets of society, basically based on a belief that humans can change sex. It’s like a new religion and if you don’t believe that humans can change sex, you are well and truly on the outer.”

Hundreds of businesses and government agencies now compete in ACON’s Australian Workplace Equality Index (AWEI), with points on offer for everything from cupcake days and gender-neutral bathrooms to paid leave for staff to “manage their gender-affirmation”.

As many as three million workers are subject to the programs. Points are scored, awards are given and there are serious disincentives in refusing to participate. The ABC now has platinum status after maintaining a gold standard for three consecutive years. Many other companies compete for status including sporting, health and banking organisations.

ACON’s entire existence relies on convincing the public humans can change sex and that gender identity is a protected characteristic. It has taken social engineering to a whole new level with devastating consequences for families and women in particular. 

The success of the project is undeniable. Nine out of 10 of Australia’s largest employers are now members of Pride in Diversity, paying about $12,000 a year for the privilege, although many pay much more for training.

Pride in Diversity, in turn, runs the AWEI, touted as “the country’s national benchmarking instrument for LGBTQ workplace inclusion”.

Employers earn points out of a total of 200, filling in a questionnaire that can run to hundreds of pages with attachments “proving” that HR policies are inclusive to ACON’s satisfaction.

“The AWEI shows that ACON has lost its way and become a mockery of its original purpose,” says Marce Hamilton, president of prominent gay and lesbian group LGB Alliance Australia.

Kit Kowalski and Stassja Frei must be applauded for their diligent and persistent efforts to expose the underbelly of ACON. They have tirelessly and thanklessly pursued the agenda for years.

She (Frei) likens the AWEI to the “Safe Schools” program, a trans-lobby driven, government-funded initiative to help create more inclusive environments in schools for LGBTIQ+ students.

“It’s the adult version of Safe Schools - it forces the queer theory belief system onto Australian workers,” Frei says.

Kowalski started sending FOI requests to government departments about their attempts to score points in the program, a project documented on the ACON Exposed website.

What she found was an almost universal uptake of ACON’s demands.

ACON is full of unelected bureaucrats and is largely unaccountable for how it spends the fees and grants. It is also somewhat protected as freedom of information requests about it are granted but so heavily redacted they are meaningless.

The alliance between ACON and the supposedly-unbiased ABC is disturbing. 

The ABC wins points and awards for developing “positive programming” streams for trans issues, like the Instagram channel ABCQueer and the podcast Innies and Outies.

“What’s disturbing about ABC Queer isn’t just that it uncritically promotes transgender ideology, but that its target audience is young people,” says Stassja Frei, producer of the podcast Desexing Society.

“It’s really not a stretch to describe ABC Queer as the propaganda arm of ACON,” she says. “They post ‘LGBTQIA+ facts’ such as ‘some women have penises’ and ‘some men have periods’.”

Employees of the ABC know better than to challenge the trans narrative.

Several ABC journalists who requested they not be identified told The Australian that while they had never been instructed to ignore a story that challenged gender affirming medical treatment or trans women playing in women’s sport, it would be almost impossible to do so without infringing the broadcaster’s inclusivity rules – or simply being accused of trans­phobia.“There are no instructions,” said one, “it’s just baked into the culture.”

The ABC is meant to be impartial and unbiased. How can it be when it is hell bent on doing the dirty work of promoting ACON’s trans agenda that defies reality and rejects science?

The ACON agenda must continue to be exposed and dismantled for the sake of reality, safeguarding children and protecting women’s sex-based rights.