Equality Australia (EA), a powerful LGBT+ lobby group that receives up to $150,000 in tax payer funds each year, is set to oppose Lesbians and women in general in the upcoming Giggle v Tickle appeal in the Federal court beginning August 4.

EA wants to help male trans activist Roxy Tickle, establish that ­female-only spaces are unlawful if they exclude men who wish they were women.

The Lesbian Action Group had already intervened to defend the position that sex is binary and unchangeable. 

EA has now set themselves against the first letter of those they were set up to defend.

The long-established lesbian group is now pitted against both Equality Australia and Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody, who has already been granted amicus curiae status in the case and whose position mirrors Ms Tickle’s.

Ms Grover told The Australian she believed the direct support from Equality Australia and its chair of Trans Equality, activist Teddy Cook, was designed from the start to create a strategic test case to establish that female-only spaces are unlawful, and in doing so to erode both women’s and LGB rights under the Sex Discrimination Act.

It appears Ms Tickle’s association with Mr Cook predates her action against Ms Grover and Giggle. Ms Tickle posted a picture of herself with Mr Cook – who was then a community health director with ACON – on social media on November 21, 2021, two weeks before lodging her first complaint against Ms Grover with the Human Rights Commission.

“That tells me it was legal activism, it was planned,” Ms Grover said. “One thing I know for sure is that before Tickle went on the app, he knew who I was, what my stance on female-only spaces (was), and then he went on the app – so I was his perfect sitting duck, I just didn’t know it.”

Displaying monumental stupidity, both the Sex Discrimination Commisioner and Equality Australia want to argue that sex is changeable and non-binary.

This position ignores reality and defies science. No human has ever changed their sex, regardless of feelings, costumes, drugs or surgical procedures.

Ms Grover said she was disappointed to learn Equality Australia had sought to join Dr Cody in opposing her appeal, but more upset that the LGBTIQ+ group was standing against lesbians.

“My heart sank when I saw it, because they aren’t actually intervening against me, they’re intervening against the lesbians – the first letter, the L in their acronym they claim to advocate for.

“Either lesbian means something specific or it doesn’t. And if men can be lesbians, what are you advocating for? Because to say that a man can be a lesbian, you are now advocating for the rights of heterosexual men, not homosexual women. You’ve completely flipped it while gaslighting society that you’re sitting there caring for this rainbow community.”

This case is incredibly important for all Australians. Politicians have written laws that defy natural laws and are not sustainable. Will the court find on the side of reality, backed by evidence based science, or according to the activists who operate on the foundation of lies and deception?