I have lost the appeal regarding the 2-year apprehension of violence order I am under.

Apparently, it is violence in NSW Australia to take photos from the public domain and repost them asking the question, “Why is a male playing in a female soccer team?”

It is deemed “harassment” by the courts to repeatedly ask the question with the image from the public domain because Football NSW and Football Australia ignore the questions.

Unlike in the USA where Lia Thomas could be named and the debate entered into, males who identify as women in NSW are protected, while women who oppose their participation in women’s sport are demonised and penalised with apprehension of violence orders (AVO).

The courts automatically accepted he is female and refer to him as she/her/miss despite there being zero evidence a person can change sex. Rewriting historical and biological facts on a birth certificate does not change reality. Nor do costumes, drugs or surgeries. A male cannot change his DNA, skeletal frame or reproductive capacity to create large gametes called eggs. There are only two sexes. Male and female. Males have a body geared around the production of small gametes known as sperm. The bodies may function fully or partially but there is no third gamete and there is no ability to change sex.

Despite the two-year AVO being placed on me by the court, I 100 per cent denounce that I am violent, or that my advocacy for women’s sex-based rights is violent. Females who are forced to accept males in their spaces, sports and services feel harassed but have no recourse in law. Only males who wish they were women have that privilege. 

If they can change the meaning of the word “woman” then of course they think they can redefine the word “violence”.

All females, and males for that matter, must be able to speak truth, without fear of being taken to court or be labelled as violent, for advocating for sex-based reality.

What did I do?

I did take a photo that was posted in the public domain and re-shared it.

I did ask reasonable and polite questions such as “why have male and female divisions if males can participate as women?”

I did campaign as a political advocate and led thousands of people to ask similar questions of football associations, the media and politicians in an effort to engage them with this very important discussion.

I did use the image of the male who participates in female soccer as a case study.

I do NOT apologise or regret doing so.

What I did NOT do

I did not direct any posts or advocacy toward the male player.

I did not name him.

I have never met him.

I did not turn up to any games or training.

I did not ask others to do so.

I did not call for any violence or harassment of this player.

All inferences that I did were not cross examined and I had no opportunity to defend such accusations in court.

This finding will NOT stop me from advocating for women’s sex-based sport, spaces or services. 

Australian citizens must be free to speak the truth and identify males in female spaces, services and sport. It is for the safety, dignity and fairness of women and girls that I will continue to speak out. It is to safeguard children and protect parental rights.