The nurse repeatedly stated there are only two sexes

Canadian nurse Amy Hamm has been found guilty of professional misconduct by the B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM). 

Her supposed crime was to repeatedly state the biological, evidence-based scientific fact that there are only two sexes. 

The BCCNM rules that her comments were “discriminatory and derogatory towards transgender persons.”

For more than two years Hamm has fought to defend the reality of two sexes in a profession that relies on biology but in this case is happy to reject science. 

There have been more than 20 days of disciplinary hearings.

No patient has ever made a complaint, only politically motivated trans-sympathisers have driven this case. 

The complaints focused on a billboard stating support for author JK Rowling and making several online posts.

Hamm was warned by her lawyers to temper her comments or risk facing harsher penalties. 

Hamm has rejected the advice to write an article explaining her position. 

“I can’t do that. I have reached the summit of my tolerance for catering to the demands of gender activists and the institutional forces that they weaponize against women who speak the truth. I have had it.

“From my guilty verdict: “The panel understands that the statement that there are only two sexes — male and female — is an oversimplification that does not align with current medical or biological understanding.

“My ruling was given by a three-person panel consisting of a former nurse, a current nurse, and one public representative, with the assistance of a constitutional lawyer. “(T)he Panel is not concerned with the validity of the Respondent’s beliefs,” they wrote in their ruling.

‘That is simply untrue — as evidenced by the very statements given in the same ruling.

“I have a one-word response to this: pseudoscience.

“And, later: “It is discriminatory and derogatory to suggest that transgender women should not be in the same spaces as cisgender women,” they concluded. What does that mean? It means that the panel believes that to advocate for the protection of women’s spaces — as is our Charter-protected right — is wrong, improper, and discriminatory for any regulated professional to do. That is ludicrous.

“Women are not doing anything wrong by advocating for our own shelters, prisons, sports, and safe spaces, free from males who identify as females. Full stop. Women are a distinct category, both in biology and — presently — in law (notwithstanding the clash of “gender identity” and “sex” in human rights legislation).

Amy Hamm writes what most reasonable people understand to be true and real. 

No one can change their sex. Women’s rights are essential, not wrong or hateful. 

The nurse criticised the panel for insisting that she should have tempered her advocacy to preserve the feelings of males who wish they were women.

“How could I have possibly won this case, considering this? It would have been impossible. No tone, no word choice, and no self-flagellation or obedience would have sufficed: because I have been censured and accused of discrimination for the very act of advocating for women’s spaces.

Amy Hamm has vowed to continue the fight for reality and women’s sex-based rights. She refuses to apologise or be contrite.

“I stand proudly in defence of the truth, and I lament and denounce a profession that has been subverted by a quasi-religious, metaphysical belief system that infringes upon the rights of women and girls, and harms youth.

“My conscience does not permit me to lie, or to lie down, in the face of gender ideology.

“Punish me harder, if you must. The truth always wins in the end.”