$95,000 in damages and contradictory orders

My penalty for being guilty of “unlawful vilification” has been handed down.

In summary $95,000 in fines which will double if I don't pay in 28 days. 

The orders also state I need to undertake some contradictory actions. 

Firstly, I am to remove any posts or references to the two male players in female sport. I am not to name them or refer to them in future posts.

Secondly, I am to pin a post to all socials and the website, worded and ordered by the court, that names both of them It is basically a confession that I am guilty of vilifying them.

How can I do both?

I will be putting in a notification to appeal the decision asap. Free speech is at stake, and truthful speech is being punished.

I can’t really comment further on specifics, but I want you to know your support, your voice and your action are invaluable to me. Thank you!

I also want to state I did not ever go to a game, encourage others to go or make any “call to arms” to injure or harm anyone. There are so many issues of contention in the cases it is ridiculous and I will be including them in my appeal. The lack of evidence for some of the claims now stated as fact are very concerning.

It was Football NSW and a local football club that publicly posted their information, I simply reshared it.

I will say it is supremely disappointing that the word ‘woman’ has been redefined to include males and that the words ‘violence’ & 'vilification' have been applied to speaking the truth about information in the public domain.

Australians should be very concerned about their freedoms.

Women have effectively been erased from law and attempts to advocate regarding public policy are shut down for the sake of the feelings of a few. 

Males should never be permitted to participate in female sport. As a registered third-party political campaigner and as a woman, I should have the right to advocate for this without being penalised.

This decision, along with the High Court Appeal for the apprehension of violence order being denied, sets a precedent that all journalists, politicians and political advocates must take note of.

They could be subject to the same punishment and restrictions if they chose to identify males in female sport or spaces. 

In the US and around the world the dreadful images of Iman Khelif punching women in the head during the Olympics, William “Lia” Thomas winning swimming competitions and Gavin “Laurel” Hubbard standing on a women’s podium for weightlifting, resulted in the fantastic actions getting some men out of women’s sport. 

Imagine if we had never seen their images or read their names in reports. They would still be getting away with it. Perhaps if they want to keep competing they should all move to Australia where they will enjoy limitless protections and their opponents will be punished?

The law in Australia might state men can be women, but it defies the laws of nature and cannot be sustained. Eventually, the laws will reflect reality again, but until then, we cannot relent.

Nothing will steal my joy in knowing that I am a woman and no male ever will be. 

I am proud to stand for truth and reality. I am so proud and thankful that you are standing with me.